Category Archives: iPad Accessories
As we draw near to the end of 2016, everyone is posting their “year in review” summaries.
While 2016 has been a terrible year for many, and while some bad things happened to my family and I in 2016, generally it was a pretty good year, and we end the year counting our many blessings.
The big story of 2016 in educational technology has been the dominance–or the reported dominance of the Chromebook in education. Chromebooks sessions are the topics people are attending these days, and schools are buying a bunch of them.
If you have Chromebooks, the best solutions are going to cost money in the form of annual subscriptions. The best Chromebook applications are generally the same applications that have been web-based on Windows and Mac for the past years. Look at all of the products that are carried by MusicFirst, along with Flat.io, The New SmartMusic, and SoundTrap.
The best device isn’t a device from 2016–it remains the 12.9″ iPad Pro. We are awaiting a refresh of this model, but the new large iPad is ideal for music educators, particularly when paired with an Apple Pencil and AirPlay wireless mirroring in the classroom.
The two apps that I would recommend as “apps of the year” would be newcomers to the scene: Newzik and Sheet Music Scanner. I have not made the shift to Newzik yet, but they are positioned well as a company that can read PDF files OR MusicXML files. In other words, Newzik is ready for the next generation of digital sheet music. Sheet Music Scanner is a game changer, as it is a relatively small app that is being aggressively updated, and does an incredible job scanning music (although it doesn’t scan everything). As I have mentioned previously, if I have to choose one app for app of the year, it would be Sheet Music Scanner. Sheet Music Scanner completes the ability for me to scan, edit, and export music all from my iPad without having to touch my computer.
In terms of hardware, there haven’t been many new products for music education. I am glad to see the growth (albeit slow) of devices like the CME XKey Air, wonderful bluetooth MIDI keyboards, and the Yamaha bluetooth MIDI adapters. For bluetooth foot pedals and iPad stands, I would recommend AirTurn…although there are a few products from IK Multimedia.
In terms of full-blown notation programs, it has been a big year with a new product (Dorico), major updates (Finale 25 and Notion 6), and regular updates (Sibelius, StaffPad, and MuseScore).
And in classroom music, we have seen the introduction of Music First, Jr., and well as the continued growth and support from Quaver Music.
As we close out of 2016, I think we are fortunate to have the devices, accessories, and applications that are on the market. For the most part, there is very little that I want to do with technology that I cannot do with solutions that are on the market. It hasn’t always been that way.
I hope 2016 has been a good year for you (even if there have been challenges), and I wish you the best in 2017. Thanks, as always, for stopping by (or subscribing to) and reading this blog.
As always, app links in my blogs are usually referral links that send 7% of the total purchase price (out of Apple’s 30% of the purchase price) to the “referrer.” The developer receives the full 70% of the revenue from their app–so when you purchase from a referral link, you financially support this blog whose content remains free and not behind a pay wall. Thank you for using these referral links!
I have mentioned this before, but Aron Nelson (creator of unrealBook) has put together a very mice resource for PDF music readers. He has expanded the forum with a few other tech tips for iPad users as well.
If you haven’t logged into the forum–please consider joining, and asking questions if you have them!
At the introduction of iOS 4 (2010), Steve Jobs said, “If you see a stylus, they blew it.”
Reality isn’t that simple. If you NEED a stylus to operate a device, you have “blown it.” That said, there are situations where you need more finite control on a writing surface than just your finger. Both Samsung (on earlier, non-exploding Note models of phones and tablets) and Microsoft (Surface devices) have capitalized on that ability. There are times a stylus is wonderful, and in music, we have a lot of those moments.
For example, if your digital music reader can accept written input, a stylus is usually far better than a finger. Another example is writing notation (or diacritical markings) with NotateMe or Notion in iOS.
Apple understood this–they were not handcuffed by Steve Jobs’ earlier pronouncement about styluses. When the iPad Pro 12.9″ device came out, the Pencil came along with it–and other than criticism for being glossy and rolling away too easily, it is generally accepted as the finest non-Wacom tool on the market for any stylus device.
If you own an older iPad (as I do), or any other device than an iPad Pro (phones, Android phones, Android Tablets), you cannot use the Apple Pencil. It does not register on a non-iPad Pro.
I searched for the right stylus for years. I originally liked the Cosmonaut, a large white-board marker type stylus. I later fell in love with the Maglus, followed by styluses with Fiber Mesh tips, and finally I fell in love the Adonit Jot Pro. I have an entire drawer full of discarded styluses (styli?).
The problem with Stylus input is that a touch device is looking for the capacitve touch of a finger, with a minimum circular area of 4mm. A stylus somehow has to mimic a larger area while giving the user a finer “tip” than their own finger.
About a year ago, Adonit introduced the Jot Dash, a pen-like stylus that didn’t need a Bluetooth connection or to have specific apps running Adonit’s developer’s kit for the stylus to work. It is battery powered, and when turned on, the Jot Dash creates an electrical capacitive touch from a very small pen-like tip. I have used the Jot Dash since Christmas last year, and it has been the best stylus experience of my 8 years of iOS device use. It is a $50 stylus, and it doesn’t work as well as Apple’s Pencil ($99)–but it far outperforms any other stylus I have ever owned.
About two weeks ago, Adonit announced two new styluses. The first is a new version of the Jot Dash, and the other is a thin and flat stylus called the Adonit Snap. The Snap was immediately appealing for three reasons. First, the Snap charges with an embedded micro USB connection. The Jot Dash requires a separate magnetic USB charger–and I have lost track of that charger a number of times. Second, I liked the shape of the Snap, as it was reminiscent of the Maglus Sylus, which was shaped like a drafting pencil. A drafting pencil allows you to hold it like pencil or a marker–which was very functional and something that appealed to me. Third, the Snap has a button that is intended to act as a bluetooth shutter for a cell phone. As an added benefit beyond those three things, the Snap is roughly $10 cheaper than the Jot Dash and it has an embedded magnetic mount to help hold it to a device.
I ordered a Snap, and the it arrived last week. After a week of use, I wish the Snap was a little thicker. It is almost too narrow (and slippery) to hold comfortably. The dimensions of the Snap are purposeful…it is meant to be a small stylus to carry with a cell phone. Even so, I would prefer a bit more meat on its bones. The Snap\ is also shorter than the Jot Dash…and I would have made the Snap just as long. It isn’t too short for writing…but it could have been just a little longer in terms of feeling more like a writing tool.
In use, the Snap functions the same as the Jot Dash. Something is strange with the iPad Air 2 (my current iPad) where the tip of the Jot Dash or the Adonit Snap draws a diagonal line as “wavy” if you go slow (I do not believe this happens on any other device).
The Snap beats the Jot Dash in that it charges in device with a needed USB adapter…and that fact alone may make it worth the purchase.
So…if you need a stylus and don’t have an iPad Pro…consider either of these two styluses. The Jot Dash 2 feels better to hold, the Adonit Snap is just more convenient to use without having to worry about the location of a charger.
This review is for the Yamaha UD-BT01, available around $50 from many vendors. In a pre-summary, this is a device that needs to be plugged into a USB power adapter, but then allows a MIDI instrument that normally uses USB MIDI to connect to a computer to become a Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) MIDI device that utilizes BLE MIDI to connect to a computer/tablet/phone which allows BLE MIDI (a feature found in newer iOS and Mac OS devices). In short, BLE MIDI is low latency and has no cords, which is a huge benefit when working with a computer or tablet.
This review requires me to travel back in time a few weeks, when I reviewed the CME XKey Air and the CME WIDI Bud. After posting a review, a reader e-mailed to let me know that the Quicco Sound mi.1, the Yamaha UD-BT01, and the Yamaha MD-BTO1 did not work with the CME WIDI Bud. I was able to verify that my 1st generation mi.1 did not work with the WIDI Bud, but I could not verify that the Yamaha devices did not work. As a result, I did what any blogger would do–I reached out to Yamaha and asked for a review unit. Yamaha graciously sent out a UD-BT01 for me to work with. It arrived yesterday and I have been working with it for a day.
The UD (can I just call it that for now?) is a USB dongle of its own that is not meant to plug into a computer. Instead, it is meant to receive a USB cable from a MIDI instrument, and then the UD is meant to plug into a USB power adapter (whatever you have on hand–my Apple iPhone USB brick worked just fine. So…the UD is made to receive a USB cable (we call this a “female” adapter) and to plug into an adapter (“male”).
Put another way, this adapter needs to be plugged into a power source to work. Therefore, if you need wireless capability without having to attach it to electricity…the UD will not be your device. If that is the case, see if the Zivix PUC+ might work for you (It is important to note is that the PUC+ can use either USB or traditional MIDI connections). Two examples of potable keyboards where a plugged-in solution may not be best are the Akai LPK 25 or the (original) CME XKey, both which normally communicate to a computer/tablet through a USB cable, drawing power through the USB cable.
Back to the UD, If you happen to have a power source near by (and you will for many keyboards), this adapter is a nice solution to convert an existing device to a BLE MIDI device.
I attached the UD to both my Casio PX 350 M and my Akai LPK 25. It worked flawlessly with iOS, as I expected that it would. The secret is to connect to the device in any BLE MIDI equipped app (e.g. GarageBand, Notion) and then use any other MIDI app. Once the device is connected in iOS, it can be used in any Core MIDI app. (Note: In GarageBand, go to settings (wrench), then Advanced, then Bluetooth MIDI Devices. If the UD is turned on, it will show up, and a single click will connect to it. If you see nothing at all, make sure Bluetooth is turned on in control center,)
My MacBook isn’t new enough to run BLE MIDI and my Chromebook does not have BLE MIDI. As a result, I connected the UD to both devices via the CME WIDI Bud. The WIDI Bud connects by itself to the first device it senses , so you need to make sure that you only have the device that you want to use (should you have multiple BLE MIDI instruments in your procession) turned on. In both situations, the WIDI Bud connected to the UD just fine, and I was able to work with Notion and GarageBand on my MacBook, and Noteflight, Flat, and SoundTrap on my Chromebook.
As for Windows, my Windows device is an Asus T-100 Transformer, and it simply doesn’t work well (It is slow and was cheap. You get what you pay for). I bought that device a few years ago to be able to help music teachers with Windows computers. The T-100 does not have BLE MIDI (and I am not even sure that BLE MIDI is yet incorporated into Windows 10), and the WIDI Bud just doesn’t seem to work well with my computer. Using CME’s WIDI Plus app, I can connect to various devices and the UD shows up on the bottom of the screen as a MIDI device nearby, but I cannot connect to it.
One of the joys of Bluetooth Wireless MIDI is that it takes a lot of the complexity out of MIDI connections. Connecting with an iOS device or a Mac, or even a Chromebook with a WIDI Bud, is fast and easy with no cables to worry about and no messing around with MIDI settings (sometimes you have to select the WIDI Bud as an Input/Output device on a web app, like Flat.io). MIDI was always a pain on my Windows computers (I was a convert to Mac in late 2008) and it looks like it still is today.
The UD works as expected and doesn’t get hot, so I would leave it plugged in most of the time without worrying about it. The adapter is small, and wouldn’t take well to being stepped on. Therefore, make sure the adapter is somewhere out of the way where it will be stepped on or crushed (e.g. We had a floor power source for my old Yamaha Clavinova Baby Grand, so that would not be a good place for the UD to live).
There is a hole on the UD, and I am not sure what it is for. I wouldn’t want to put it on a keychain, but I imagine a number of them could be stored by running a twisty-tie through that hole. $50 is a low price to pay to convert an existing MIDI instrument to a BLE MIDI instrument–so you may find this a good solution for you. You do not need to have a Yamaha piano to use this device. If you have an older Mac or iOS device, or a Chromebook and would like to turn it into a BLE MIDI capable device, consider the WIDI Bud from CME (See B & H, who carries it). As a reminder…an old iOS device will need the USB to 30 pin Camera Connection Kit to plug in the WIDI Bud.
In summary, the UD-BT01 is a great solution if you have a keyboard with USB MIDI that plus into the wall and you want to make it into a BLE MIDI device. If you are dealing with a portable keyboard, this really isn’t the device for you (you can make it work, but you need to be near a power socket), and as Yamaha reminds you on their packaging, the UD requires the use of a USB power adapter (i.e. the brick that likely charges your phone). There was a time that I would have said, “Yamaha should include the power charger,” but USB chargers can be found anywhere and you can likely find a spare one in your home, or it is easy enough to just go buy one.
I love to see all of these options for Bluetooth MIDI, which I feel is a significant improvement to the old way of dealing with MIDI instruments.
A very special thank you to Yahama for letting me test out the UD-BT01, which was introduced at Winter NAMM in early 2016.
This is a long review, and I apologize for the length, but I am very fond of these items and they deserve some coverage. If you want to read a very quick summary, check out my last post. I also had to publish an incomplete draft in order to add in-document links, so if you received e-mail notification about the post and it was incomplete, I apologize.
I love technology, and I love teaching others about technology in relation to what they are doing in their classrooms. I have a special affinity for technology that “changes the game” and makes technology easier to use or easier to incorporate into our lives. As a music teacher and a musician–there are few occurrences where I am bursting with excitement about a product. This is one of those situations.
This review is going to look at a CME’s XKey Air and the CME WIDI BUD. You can click on either of those last two links to skip to the section about that product, and there is a (20 minute) video at the end of the review.
If you want to buy these devices, visit the CME Website. Whie the WIDI BUD website is “live,” at the moment, the only place to buy the WIDI BUD is B&H (This will change over time). Special thanks to CME and Virgin Musical Instruments for making these products available for this review and for the sessions that I will be presenting in the 2016-2017 academic year.
The XKey first came to my attention in late 2014, as a representative from CME (or more specifically, their distributor in the United States) contacted me about the product and their coming attendance at TMEA. While the company has been around since 1993, the current CME was formed in 2012. After reading some reviews on the Internet, I can’t tell when the original XKey came out (my best guess is 2014) as a high quality portable MIDI keyboard. The features of that keyboard included high quality materials, full sized keys, function buttons (instead of wheels), velocity-sensitive keys, and low-travel keys. While the keyboard can be used for performance, the target was portable studio and notation work–something it is perfect for.
I remember stopping by CME’s booth at TMEA, seeing the XKey for the first time, and showing them the Miselu C.24 keyboard. I asked them to consider BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) MIDI with their keyboard. At the time, my C. 24 was one of the few of those devices “in the wild” as they sent it to me early so that I could show it at various music education conferences. Just a word about the C.24–I lost mine in Nashville at NAfME. The C.24 was an exciting device as it was the first BLE MIDI device on the market. It promised to be a device that could be used as an iPad cover, and featured the ability to “flip” the device into form to make a playable keyboard that worked with magnets (not springs). You could combine multiple units to make a longer keyboard. The keys were scaled on an old model of a “woman’s” piano (apparently, piano keys used to be a relative item, based on the desires of the purchaser versus an industry standard). The C. 24 works, and is still available from Miselu at a (now lower) cost of $149. I do worry about the durability of the C. 24 (all the moving parts to flip open the device) and the future of the company (it still hasn’t released a promised control module to backers)–plus the function of the case changed when Apple changed the design of the iPad and the C.24 could no longer be used as an iPad case. This means that the market is still open to a high quality BLE MIDI portable keyboard, and the XKey Air fits the bill.
In addition to my feedback, CME heard that same feedback (“Please add BLE MIDI”) from a number of users, and ran a Indegogo Campaign to provide the capital to start that product. That project was funded by August 2015, and started shipping this spring.
In form, the XKey Air and the original XKey are identical. In fact, the only difference would be a Bluetooth sticker on the XKey Air, as well as multiple LED indicators and a power button on the Air. In my video review, I talk about the packaging of the XKey Air, which may seem irrelevant. After all, why does the packaging matter? I don’t know why, but it does. Part of the joy of buying an Apple product is the unboxing experience, which was carefully designed for the user. The XKey Air comes packaged in the same thoughtful way as an Apple device, and would fit perfectly on the shelves of an Apple Store. There are a couple of instruction sheets in the box, as well as a labeled micro USB cable. If you have other micro USB cables in your house, you can use them with the XKey Air–but I like having cables labeled so you know what device they came came with.
As for the keyboard, it is a joy to use. It pairs effortlessly with BLE MIDI on the iPad. As with most BLE MIDI devices, it is instantly detected by the iPad and connects with a single touch. While the keys do not have the tradition “travel” of a piano keyboard, they are pressure sensitive and every button works as it should. Some reviews of the original XKey longed for a way to attach a sustain pedal to the keyboard (instead of pressing a key on the XKey Air), but this is a portable keyboard–attaching cables and secondary pedals defeats the portable purpose of the keyboard. The low-travel keys should make the keyboard more resilient to throwing it into a backpack and running along. I had issues with other previous portable USB keyboards that I have used over the years (One example was an M-Audio 25 key unit that did not stand up to portable use).
My only complaints about the XKey Air are minor. First, the 25 key model costs $199, and the 37 key model costs $299. The original 25 key XKey is $99, and the 37 key XKey is $199. As both a consumer and a music educator, I would love to see the price point drop on these models. That said, if you have an original XKey, you can attach a Zivix PUC+ to it and make it a portable BLE keyboard for the same cost of $199. In other words, the price point isn’t terribly inflated, but I would still love to see a small price drop . I would imagine that some kind of education pricing (for the original XKey or the XKey Air) could be obtained if you reached out to the company. My other complaint is that it would nice if the XKey Air included a light bag of some kind to offer protection as you throw it into a backpack.
Is it worth buying the XKey Air for $100 more than its equivalent XKey? It depends on what you want to use it for.
The XKey Air is an ideal device for anyone wanting a portable MIDI keyboard interface without wires. When I am working with my iPad or my MacBook, I prefer not having to deal with cables. Additionally, an iPad needs a USB dongle (an additional $29 purchase) to work with a a USB MIDI keyboard.
If I were creating a school MIDI lab with fixed computers, I would consider the original XKey (even above a comparable M-Audio product). They are going to look great in your lab and will hold up to the rigors of daily use. This would also be true if I was teaching with Chromebooks…you probably are not going to buy a WIDI BUD (more on that in a moment) for each Chromebook.
However, if I needed keyboards for a 1:1 iPad school where student iPads were the MIDI lab (not a separate room), I would consider the XKey Air (even at $100 more per device). Why not go truly mobile with your lab? Also, if I was the teacher and I did any work at all in GarageBand (SoundTrap, Soundation) or notation programs, I would want a portable keyboard, particularly if the device I was using was a portable device (MacBook, iPad, Chromebook). As a warning, in a 1:1 scenario, each XKey Air has a unique MAC Bluetooth address, but show up as “XKey Air 25 BLE” on the Bluetooth MIDI interaction panel. This would make connecting difficult–much as we found with our Bluetooth QWERTY keyboards in our 1:1. If every device has the same name, how do you know which one you are using? Zivix has a unique identifier with every name, so I know it is possible to uniquely identify each BLE MIDI device, and I hope that CME is able to add this functionality in a future firmware update (if it isn’t there already, which I may have missed while looking through they XKey app).
In short, I think both CME XKey keyboards are wonderful. They are high quality portable keyboards and a far better solution (in my opinion) than mini keyboards like my old Akai LPK 25, my old M-Audio key stations, and even the Miselu C.24. Do you need the BLE MIDI feature? That’s up to you–I would say, “Yes,” because if you want to add it later, you can (Zivix PUC+) for relatively the same price-but then you again need cables (of a sort) to use the feature. It is wonderful to be able to connect without wires to your iPad, MacBook, Windows laptop, or Chromebook. I do wish the pricing was a bit lower on the XKey Air ($150), but $199 isn’t terribly out of the ballpark. When I spend money on devices, I have to ask if they save me time and frustration in the long run over doing things another way. In the world of iPad, the XKey Air allows me to connect to my iPad without a dongle (as it would to a newer Mac [2012?] than may 2008 Aluminum MacBook) which is a separate $29 purchase. It means less time to connect and take down, and less things to forget going from place to place. So if you are going to use a keyboard with your computing device–in terms of convince, it simply may be the best option to spend an extra $100 for the Bluetooth capability.
So yes, if you are interested, either the XKey or the XKey Air is a “consider buying” item.
When I opened the package from CME, my initial reaction to the WIDI BUD, packaged in a small blister card with minimal instructions, was, “HO HUM.”
That initial reaction was really, really, really wrong. It is going to be a while until BLE MIDI is packaged with every device. If you have a newer iPad or MacBook, you have it already–but old Apple devices, many Windows devices, most Android devices, and most (all?) Chromebooks do not have BLE MIDI capability.
This little dongle, which looks like a newer flash drive, gives BLE MIDI capability to nearly every device.
This means that you can use an XKey Air with an older iPad, MacBook, Windows computer…you get the idea. There are limitations (you have to be running Windows XP SP3, Ver 4 of Android, iOS 4.2, Chrome 43.0) but generally, if you have a modern device, the WIDI BUD can add BLE MIDI to your computing device if it does not have it.
Last summer, Web MIDI was announced, and over the last year, programs have been adding it: Noteflight, Flat.io, SoundTrap to name a few.
With this dongle, you can make a Chromebook into a BLE MIDI device, utilizing Web MIDI on these programs. Sure, you can also add a wired USB connection, which is what you would do for students (you would have a stack of physical keyboards that they would check out, use, and return). But for YOUR use…go wireless. Trust me on this one.
What is amazing is that the WIDI BUD makes a connection with a BLE MIDI device on its own. I haven’t tried having two BLE MIDI sending devices turned on at the same time, so I do not know how the device would respond to two competing devices for its attention–but plug in the WIDI BUD, and turn on the XKey Air, and it works. That’s it. The WIDI BUD will remember that connection until it loses power. So, if you want to connect another BLE MIDI device (such as the JamStik+ or the PUC+), turn off the XKey Air, turn on the JamStik+, and plug in the WIDI BUD.
So yes…the WIDI BUD works with ANY existing BLE MIDI device. (See note)
Let me copy and paste that again…
The WIDI BUD works with ANY existing BLE MIDI device. (See note)
So…the JamStik+, the PUC+, the Korg MKey Air, and the few keyboards sold with BLE MIDI…should be able to work with the WIDI BUD.
Note: This statement was not true. It turns out that the Quicco Sound mi.1. See more at my follow-up article.
I have now said this for over a year…reliable MIDI interaction with a BLE MIDI device is a game changer in ease of use and functionality.
Chromebooks being able to use MIDI keyboards over a wired USB connection is a major step forward, and it means that I could teach Music Theory (mostly with Noteflight or Flat.io) with Chromebooks, and I could teach a Music Technology class (SoundTrap, Soundation, Noteflight, Flat.io) using Chromebooks. But to be able to connect wirelessly means that using those programs for my own use (not just in teaching) becomes a possibility.
Being able to use any BLE MIDI device with just about any host computing device is a game changer, too. At that point, you are only limited by the apps and programs that are available on your computing device. And remember…on Chrome OS, the best apps require a subscription to get all of the features that you want to use (Noteflight requires a subscription to even use MIDI recording). I don’t think there is anything wrong with that, because companies deserve to earn money. But it is something that we need to teach IT departments as they typically don’t plan for annual subscriptions.
My only complaints about the WIDI BUD are the size of the device (it has to be that small, but people will lose them), and they are a TIGHT fit in your USB port (which is probably intentional so that you leave it plugged in). I am leaving this WIDI BUD in its package after I use it, so that I can keep track of it.
My only other complaint is that I can’t find the pricing for the WIDI BUD on CME’s website, so I am hoping that it is released soon and will be affordable!
As you can tell, if you have a computing device that does not have BLE MIDI, I think the WIDI BUD is a must buy. I don’t know anything else like it on the market.
Thanks again to CME and Virgin Musical Instruments for allowing me to review and show off these devices. A video appears below.